Property:Text
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"Text" is a predefined property that represents text of arbitrary length and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki. This property is pre-deployed (also known as special property) and comes with additional administrative privileges but can be used just like any other user-defined property.
For longer texts.
R
You wonder "what do people think of the whole Semantic Web idea?". Well...
I suffered through the 80's Knowledge Representation fad, both academically in the AI program at Edinburgh and as a practitioner at the only company ever to produce a commercial system written in Prolog (that wasn't a Prolog development system.) So I'm familiar with the problems that the Semantic Web effort is attempting to address. Having slogged through real-life efforts to encode substantial amounts of knowledge, I find some of the misty-eyed musings that surround the Semantic Web effort depressing. That "most information on the Web is designed for human consumption" is seen as an obstacle surmountable via tools like RDF is especially sad. On the other hand, I'm always happy to make use of the cool tools that these sorts of things seem to throw off. There's probably a certain Proverbs 26:11 aspect to it as well. +
wahnsinn, sieht escht aus, als würde er aus dem wasser heraus kommen.
was mir einfällt:
eine frau geht nach irland zum studieren. den ersten monat regnet es nur. den zweiten auch. ihre laune sinkt und sinkt... als sie auf die strasse geht, nachdem sie drei monate nur regen mitbekommen hat, schreit sie irgendwann wutentbrannt den nächsten passanten an:
"Regnet es eigentlich immer???!"
Der Passant, der sich angesprochen fühlt, zuckt nur die schultern und meint: "ich weiss nicht, ich bin erst 26!" +
*räusper*
bei dir hat sich irgendwas verschoben.
*guckt auf jahreslinkliste* +
Hm? Was denn? Nur das Stylefile fehlt, oder?
Kann ich nur von daheim aus lösen, habe hier das Stylefile nicht gespeichert. +
den muss ich mir auch noch geben. will aber den ersten nochma davor ansehen.
deeeeeeeeeennyyyyyyyy.........??? magst da nochma rein??? +
Geschichtenerzählen 2.0 ... toller Vergleich ^^ +
:D gefällt mir.
Foobar 2.0 klingt auch viel besser als Mitmach-foobar ;) +
S
In fact, I am in the conference also!! I got to your blog thanks to technorati and it was really nice to see other people's blog on the subject.
It is even more funny to think that you could be right now at 2meters of me and we don't know each other ;-)
Greetings from Heraklion!
FeR +
Yes, that's funny. Maybe we will still meet! :) Any presentations you have? Tried to look in your blog, but my Spanish sucks.
Greeting to Heraklion, from Heraklion! +
How many of the people at SSSW are going to be at the Protege conference next week? +
T
*
+
U
Hi Denny! Nice little essay. I aggree that the unique name assumption would not be a good choice for the semantic web, since we would all have to agree on a common vocabulary for everything before we could even start putting semantic information on the web.
However, I do not understand why inverse functional properties would break with the unique name assumption. In foaf persons are identified with the hash value of their email addresses. With the unique name assumption, we would not be allowed to use two different URIs for the same person. Hence we would not need inverse functional properties and the problem would not occur in the first place.
Greetings,
Ben +
V
W
