]> 2026-04-22T13:49:11-07:00 What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2 0 en 2005-01-10T16:25:00Z 2453381.1840278 2007-12-28T02:37:44Z 2454462.609537 What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2 Hi Richard, you are totally right - the example fails. But I took it on purpose, nevertheless: because humans, when they read the predicate "foaf:interest" will think that it means that Subject is interested in the Object. You are right - and I point it out in the Blog - it actually means the Subject is interested in the Topic of the Object. But I think this is an (intentional) bug in the FOAF-specification. Intentional in order to make writing FOAF-files easier, a bug nevertheless because it creates a cognitive difference between the expected naive and intented specified use of "foaf:interest". I wanted to stress this cognitive difference with this example. The second reason for selecting this example is to make the reader wary of such subtle differences and mistakes that can happen everywhere. Anything claimed about the Semantic Web should be taken with care, no matter who claims it! Thanks for your comments, denny 2 0 0 plainlist 1 [[:What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2]] What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2# QUERY87a4374eb0492c53e78d87c50e90f17c 0 1 plainlist 6 [[Category:Comment]] [[Number::+]] [[Comments::What's in a name - Part 3]] [[Number::≤2]] What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2# QUERY1e08afe4cf5667c2dca06501352ba7c8 0 1 plainlist 6 [[Category:Comment]] [[Number::+]] [[Comments::What's in a name - Part 3]] [[Number::≥2]] What's in a name - Part 3 Comment 2# QUERYea477e75652de9d3f6a3a675381ea0a0