http://www.simia.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Semantic_Web_and_Web_2.0 2026-04-23T04:35:26Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.32.0 http://www.simia.net/index.php?title=Semantic_Web_and_Web_2.0&diff=1638&oldid=prev 2007-12-28T01:05:17Z

<p>New page: {{pubdate|21|October|2006}} I usually don&#039;t just point to other blog entries (thus being a bad blogger regarding netiquette), but this time [http://www.bnode.org/archives2/63 Benjamin Nowa...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{pubdate|21|October|2006}}<br /> I usually don't just point to other blog entries (thus being a bad blogger regarding netiquette), but this time [http://www.bnode.org/archives2/63 Benjamin Nowack nailed it in his post on the Semantic Web and Web 2.0]. I read the iX article (a popular German computer technology magazine), and I lost quite some respect for the magazine as there were so many unfounded claims, off-the-hand remarks, and so much bad attitude in the article (and in further articles scuttered around the issue) towards the Semantic Web that I thought the publisher was personally set on a crusade. I could go through the article and write a commentory on it, and list the errors, but honestly, I don't see the point. At least it made me appreciate peer review and scientific method a lot more. The implementation of peer review is flawed as well, but I realize it could be so much worse (and it could be better as well - maybe [http://www.plos.org/index.php PLoS] is a better implementation of peer review).<br /> <br /> So, go to Benji's post and convince yourself: there is no ''&quot;vs&quot;'' in Semantic Web and Web 2.0.<br /> <br /> &lt;noinclude&gt;{{Semantic Nodix post}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;</div>

imported>Denny