<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.simia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ACM_Review_II</id>
	<title>ACM Review II - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.simia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ACM_Review_II"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simia.net/index.php?title=ACM_Review_II&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T23:08:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simia.net/index.php?title=ACM_Review_II&amp;diff=300&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Denny: New page: {{pubdate|14|August|2006}} Thanks to [http://www.san-andreas-sla.org/sa/sa-offc.html#MaryLynn Mary-Lynn Bragg] for answering my complaint about non-accessible reviews so qui...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simia.net/index.php?title=ACM_Review_II&amp;diff=300&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-12-28T00:43:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: {{pubdate|14|August|2006}} Thanks to [http://www.san-andreas-sla.org/sa/sa-offc.html#MaryLynn Mary-Lynn Bragg] for answering &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/ACM_Review&quot; title=&quot;ACM Review&quot;&gt;my complaint&lt;/a&gt; about non-accessible reviews so qui...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{pubdate|14|August|2006}}&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to [http://www.san-andreas-sla.org/sa/sa-offc.html#MaryLynn Mary-Lynn Bragg] for answering [[ACM Review|my complaint]] about non-accessible reviews so quickly. She sent me the review to read, and I was quite happy with it. [http://www.lesk.com/mlesk/ Michael Lesk], one of the guys who built Unix, wrote the review, and recommended it to ''&amp;quot;designers of volunteer or collaborative systems and [...] those studying cooperative work.&amp;quot;'' Thanks, Michael, thanks Mary-Lynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sooo -- read our straightforward and easy to read [http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/Publikationen/showPublikation?publ_id=1055 paper]! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way -- I still think ACM Computing Reviews should offer their reviews for free to the public. This would increase the impact of their reviews dramatically, and also the impact of the reviewed papers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Semantic Nodix post}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Denny</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>